Lab Test
Results from
Biological Research Solutions
Laboratory Service
Performed: Evaluation of the Bacteriostatic Properties of a Water
Treatment Device Containing an Alloy of Copper and Zinc (KDF® media)
| Introduction: |
Water
treatment devices may be colonized by bacteria and thus promote the
growth of bacteria contained in the influent water. It is important,
therefore, that devices that are intended for use in potable water
supplies be tested to determine if they are bacteriostatic (i.e. do
not stimulate the growth of microorganisms). |
| Procedures: |
The testing protocol
used is described in
Table 1. This procedure provides a heavy bacterial challenge
over a seven day period followed by a period of time to allow the
growth of the challenge bacteria. If the treatment device provides
an environment that is favorable for bacterial growth, there should
be a demonstrable increase in bacterial numbers during the latter
stages of the test.
In order to
test the device, the model water system diagrammed in
Figure 1 was used. The supply water for the model system
was chlorine free deionized water that was reconstructed to approximate
Detroit city water by the injection of AOAC synthetic hard water
to achieve a final concentration of 100 ppm and a pH value of 7.0
A fresh suspension
of Enterobacter aerogenes (former name Aerobacter aero genes) was
prepared daily and injected into the flowing water stream to achieve
a final bacterial concentration of 300 cfu/ml. |
| Results
and Discussion: |
The
results of the 19 day bacterial challenge test are shown in
Table 2. For the first seven days Enterobacter was injected
into the influent water stream and the survivors that passed through
the test device were measured. There were endogenous bacteria (naturally
occurring water bacteria other than Enterobacter) present in the model
water system at the beginning of the testing, and there was a large
reduction in these bacteria as a result of passage through the water
treatment device. The results shown in Table 2 for the first seven
days of testing show the Enterobacter survivors only. The measurements
after 11 and 19 days, during which time no additional Enterobacter
was injected into the system, the results in Table 2 show the percent
reduction in these endogenous bacteria (no Enterobacter survivors
were detected).
This
testing showed that the water treatment device is bacteriostatic
and does not stimulate the growth of Enterobacter nor does it provide
an environment that promotes survival. In addition, the device is
effective in reducing the concentration of Enterobacter or other
endogenous bacteria present in the influent water (bactericidal
effect) and thus may be useful in the control of potentially harmful
bacteria that may inadvertently enter potable water supplies.
By John W.
Wireman, PhD
Dated February 25, 1991 |
Submitted by Biological
Research Solutions
John W. Wireman, PhD, Dated: February 25, 1991
To get hard copies
of this and other lab reports email
KDF Fluid Treatment, Inc.
KDF
Fluid Treatment an NSF-approved witness test lab for shower filters.
| |
 |